Summary

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Mitchell v. Budd — Opinion of the Court

The aim of Congress was to exempt employees 'employed in agriculture', § 13 (a) (6) , and those engaged in agricultural enterprises in the 'area of production', § 13 (a) (10) . That meant drawing a line between agricultural enterprises operating under ruralagricultural conditions and those subject to urban-industrial conditions. An individual working in an agricultural packing plant on the edge of Los Angeles is in a strikingly different environment from one doing the same work in a small town in the heart of Kansas.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Mitchell v. Budd — Opinion of the Court

It is also true that many employees who work their farms also work in their bulking plants. These are heavily stressed as indicia that bring the bulking plants into the agriculture exemption. But there are two other factors which in our view tip the scales the other way.
First, tobacco farmers do not ordinarily perform the bulking operation. As already mentioned, of the 300 farmers who grow this type of tobacco in this area, only 9 maintain and operate their own bulking plants. The remaining farmers have their crops processed by others.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature