Summary

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas United States v. International Union United Automobile…

One has a right to freedom of speech whether he talks to one person or to one thousand. One has a right to freedom of speech not only when he talks to his friends but also when he talks to the public. It is startling to learn that a union spokesman or the spokesman for a corporate interest has fewer constitutional rights when he talks to the public than when he talks to members of his group.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas United States v. International Union United Automobile…

It usually costs money to communicate an idea to a large audience. But no one would seriously contend that the expenditure of money to print a newspaper deprives the publisher of freedom of the press. Nor can the fact that it costs money to make a speech-whether it be hiring a hall or purchasing time on the air-make the speech any the less an exercise of First Amendment rights. Yet this statute, as construed and applied in this indictment, makes criminal any 'expenditure' by a union for the purpose of expressing its views on the issues of an election and the candidates.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas United States v. International Union United Automobile…

All union expenditures for political discourse are banned because a minority might object.
When the exercise of First Amendment rights is tangled with conduct which government may regulate, we refuse to allow the First Amendment rights to be sacrificed merely because some evil may result. Our insistence is that the regulatory measure be 'narrowly drawn' to meet the evil that the government can control.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature