Summary

by George Howard Earle, Jr. The Liberty to Trade as Buttressed by National Law…

The real evil is aptly described by the exact meaning of the word monopoly, that is, "to sell alone." That power gave a right of taxing and oppressing the whole nation, only limited by its means and necessities! Then why was not the meaning of the word just what it naturally meant? Why should it not be construed as prohibiting the power of "sole sale" or "sole purchase" in national commerce? Is it not an evil that a single person or combination can regulate every interstate transaction in a necessity of life, thus usurping the power of Congress in that respect totally and completely?
Source: Wikisource

by George Howard Earle, Jr. The Liberty to Trade as Buttressed by National Law…

Two towns unconnected by a railroad were certainly not forbidden to have a railroad because a railroad would, in a sense, be a monopoly. What was and has always been the evil was substituting for "competition," where that was either established or naturally and ordinarily possible, "sole sale" or "unified tactics" as to prices, and not at all to prevent the starting of a new industry. And that this was the intent of the common law and statute of James declaring it is shown by the reservation of right to grant patents for new inventions.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature