Summary

by John Marshall Harlan Dunwoody v. United States — Opinion of the Court

In other words, that board had no authority to incur any liability upon the part of the government for salaries or other expenses in excess of the amounts appropriated by congress for such purposes.
These views dispose of the case, adversely to the plaintiff, as to his claim for compensation as a member of the board. There is still less ground for a judgment in his favor in respect to services rendered as chief clerk, disbursing agent, and secretary. Congress never intended to incur liability for such services beyond the sums appropriated from time to time for the work of the board of health.
Source: Wikisource

by John Marshall Harlan Dunwoody v. United States — Opinion of the Court

Congress passed an act to prevent the introduction of contagious or infectious diseases into the United States, requiring the national board of health to co-operate with, and, so far as it lawfully might, aid, state and municipal boards of health to that end. The act appropriated $500,000, or so much thereof as might be necessary, to meet the expenses incurred in carrying out its provisions, and to be disbursed by the secretary of the treasury on estimates made by the national board of health, and approved by him.
Source: Wikisource

by John Marshall Harlan Dunwoody v. United States — Opinion of the Court

This purpose, if not clearly indicated by the act of 1879 establishing the board, became manifest before the plaintiff rendered the services for which, in this action, he claims compensation, as upon an implied contract. If the plaintiff is equitably entitled to be paid for any of the services in question rendered by him as a member of the board, and if the special appropriation made for the salaries and expenses of its officers and employes have been exhausted, his appeal must be made to congress.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature