Summary

by John Marshall Harlan Neal v. Delaware — Opinion of the Court

It is upon the ground that the impediment to the full protection of the laws exists by force of an express statute that the petition for removal is founded.
It is a conceded fact that a colored man has never been placed on any jury list in Delaware, and it is no answer to his demand for that right to say that he is permitted to testify and vote.
Source: Wikisource

by John Marshall Harlan Neal v. Delaware — Opinion of the Court

If an executive or judicial officer exercises power with which he is not invested by law, and does unauthorized acts, the State is not responsible for them. The action of the judicial officer in such a case, where the rights of a citizen under the laws of the United States are disregarded, may be reviewed and corrected or reversed by this court
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature