by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Summary

by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Holt v. Sarver, 442 F.2d 304 (8th Cir… (1971 | noyear)

It is not only that we, trained as judges, lack expertise in prison administration. Even a lifetime of study in prison administration and several advanced degrees in the field would not qualify us as a federal court to command state officials to shun a policy that they have decided is suitable because to us the choice may seem unsound or personally repugnant.
Source: Wikisource

by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Holt v. Sarver, 442 F.2d 304 (8th Cir… (1971 | noyear)

Prisoners are frequently attacked and raped in the dormitories and injuries and deaths have resulted. Sleep and rest are seriously disrupted. No adequate means exist to protect the prisoners from assaults. There is no satisfactory means of keeping guns, knives and other weapons away from the prison population.
The reports filed by the Commissioner at the court's direction clearly confirm the findings of Eighth Amendment violations. We deem it unnecessary to go into any greater detail in discussing the substantial evidence supporting the court's findings.
Source: Wikisource

by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Holt v. Sarver, 442 F.2d 304 (8th Cir… (1971 | noyear)

Legislative appropriations are required to obtain funds needed for the correction of constitutional deficiencies. Time is needed to recruit and train qualified free world guards. Judge Henley, by way of directions to state officials, in his opinion states:
"If Respondents will move in good faith and with diligence in the areas of prison life just discussed, namely, the trusty system, the barracks system, inmate safety, and the isolation cells, the Court thinks that subsidiary problems will tend to take care of themselves.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature