by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Summary

by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Finney v. Arkansas Board of Correction… (1974 | noyear)

We do not consider it too great a burden on the Board of Correction and prison officials to require them to make an evidentiary showing in the district court. If, as urged, there is now constitutional compliance, it should be fairly simple for respondents to demonstrate it to the district court. Once the district court is convinced that constitutional standards, as we defined them, have been met, it may terminate its jurisdiction of the case. We recognize that the sooner the district court may discharge its jurisdiction of the case, the better it is for everyone.
Source: Wikisource

by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Finney v. Arkansas Board of Correction… (1974 | noyear)

A person does not forfeit his First Amendment rights simply because he acquires a bad reputation. In like manner, a prisoner does not lose the protection of the First Amendment simply because those with whom he wishes to communicate are "disreputable" in the eyes of the prison administrators. This is not to say that when questions of institutional security are involved, officials may not be justified in limiting correspondence on a particular basis. We simply find this excuse too broad to justify application of the mailing list system to all inmates.
Source: Wikisource

by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Finney v. Arkansas Board of Correction… (1974 | noyear)

However, we confront a record and factual history of a sub-human environment in which individuals have been confined under the color of state law. The effort to make some amelioration of those conditions will simply not suffice. The fact that an individual has violated the criminal law, is generally uneducated and in poor health is no justification for inhumane treatment and brutality. Segregation from society and loss of one's liberty are the only punishment the law allows.
Affirmed in part and reversed in part; the cause is remanded to the district court with directions contained herein.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature