Summary

| override_editor,  Advanced Automation for Space Missions… (1980)

“ The similarities between the system described herein and the industrial complex of a developed nation are fairly obvious and indeed intentional. There are some significant differences, however. The automated system presented here is much more regular: The interrank transportation and communication systems are disjoint, one from another, and any one fabricator node makes only one product. The result is that the graph of the system is a lattice, rather than a random network. Furthermore, one could expand the number of nodes in each rank in such a way that the graph of the system becomes a tree. ”
Source: Wikisource

| override_editor,  Advanced Automation for Space Missions… (1980)

“ Using this discipline, at each level of detail, a designer (usually human) receives a specification for the product he is to design. He then consults a catalog of available lower products and selects those to be incorporated into the design. If he needs a lower level product which is not available, he generates specifications for that lower level product. ”
Source: Wikisource

| override_editor,  Advanced Automation for Space Missions… (1980)

“ Since IC manufacture is inherently nonreversible (one does not get useful subassemblies by disassembling a finished chip) , ICs are assumed produced by a somewhat degenerate Morph IV fabricator node which simply scraps product which fails test rather than disassembling it. Finally, it is also assumed that the entire production facility is idle, there being no current need for additional finished computers.
Figure 5.53. - Selective disassembly of failed system. The repair process begins when the suspect computer is presented to the fabricator node which produced it.
”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature