the Budapest Open Access Initiative

Summary

the Budapest Open Access Initiative BOAI10. Ten years on from the Budapest Open Access Initiative… (2012)

We should coordinate with kindred efforts less directly concerned with access to research, such as copyright reform, orphan works, digital preservation, digitizing print literature, evidence-based policy-making, the freedom of speech, and the evolution of libraries, publishing, peer review, and social media. We should look for ways to amplify our separate voices when defending common principles.
Source: Wikisource

the Budapest Open Access Initiative BOAI10. Ten years on from the Budapest Open Access Initiative… (2012)

In developing strategy and setting priorities, we recognize that gratis access is better than priced access, libre access is better than gratis access, and libre under CC-BY or the equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses. We should achieve what we can when we can.
Source: Wikisource

the Budapest Open Access Initiative BOAI10. Ten years on from the Budapest Open Access Initiative… (2012)

OA repositories should make download, usage, and citation data available to their authors, and make these data available to the tools computing alternative impact metrics. Journal publishers should do the same, whether or not their journals are OA.
Repositories should share these data with one another in standard formats, making it possible (for example) for authors to learn the total downloads for an article on deposit in multiple repositories. No author and no repository should have interest in blocking re-deposit in an additional repository simply to preserve an accurate measure of traffic.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature