New Testament canon

Definition and stakes

Portrait of Andrew Dickson White Andrew Dickson White,  History of the Warfare of Science with Theology in Christendom

“ Reverent scholars have demonstrated our sacred literature to be a growth in obedience to simple laws natural and historical; they have shown how some books of the Old Testament were accepted as sacred, centuries before our era, and how others gradually gained sanctity, in some cases only fully acquiring it long after the establishment of the Christian Church. The same slow growth has also been shown in the New Testament canon. ”
Source: Gutenberg

Portrait of Samuel Davidson Samuel Davidson,  The Canon of the Bible

“ The Old Testament was not brought down to the New; the New was raised to the Old. It is clear that the earliest church fathers did not use the books of the New Testament as sacred documents clothed with divine authority, but followed for the most part, at least till the middle of the second century, apostolic tradition orally transmitted. They were not solicitous about a canon circumscribed within certain limits. ”
Source: Gutenberg

Portrait of Washington Gladden Washington Gladden,  Who Wrote the Bible? : a Book for the People

“ The canon of the Bible is the determined and official table of contents. The settlement of the canon is the process of determining what and how many books the Bible shall contain. In the Old Testament are thirty-nine books, in the New Testament twenty-seven; and it is a fixed principle with Protestants that these books and no others constitute the Sacred Scriptures,--that no more can be added and none taken away. ”
Source: Gutenberg

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature