Mary Bateson and William Charles Smith

Biographical details

Mary Bateson and William Charles Smith 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 4… (1911)

The governing charter thenceforth in many boroughs, though not in all, was the charter which had established a close corporation, and from this time on to 1835 the boroughs made no progress in constitutional growth. The tendency for the close corporation to treat the members of the governing body as the only corporators, and to repudiate the idea that the corporation was answerable to the inhabitants of the borough if the corporate property was squandered, became more and more manifest as the history of the past slipped into oblivion.
Source: Wikisource

Mary Bateson and William Charles Smith 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 4… (1911)

The corporators came to regard themselves as members of a club, legally warranted in dividing the lands and goods of the same among themselves whensoever such a division should seem profitable. Even where the constitution of the corporation was not close by charter, the franchise tended to become restricted to an ever-dwindling electorate, as the old methods for the extension of the municipal franchise by other means than inheritance died out of use.
Source: Wikisource

Mary Bateson and William Charles Smith 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 4… (1911)

The pressure of taxation led in the 13th century to a closer definition of the burghal constitutions; the commons sought to get an audit of accounts, and (in London) not only to hear but to treat of municipal affairs. By the end of the century London had definitely established two councils, that of the mayor and aldermen, representing the old borough court, and a common council, representing the voice of the commonalty, as expressed through the city wards. The choice of councillors in the wards rested probably with the aldermen and the ward jury summoned by them to make the presentments.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature