William Feilden Craies and Thomas Allan Ingram

Biographical details

William Feilden Craies and Thomas Allan Ingram 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica (1911)

It is quite inaccurate to say that children had very few rights in England, or that animals were better protected. But before the constitution of the present police force, and in the absence of any proper system of public prosecution, it is undeniable that numberless cases of neglect and ill-treatment went unpunished and were treated as nobody’s business, because there was no person ready to undertake in the public interest the protection of the children of cruel or negligent parents.
Source: Wikisource

William Feilden Craies and Thomas Allan Ingram 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica (1911)

The Infant Life Protection Act of 1897 did not apply where only one child was taken, but now by the act of 1908, where a person undertakes for reward the nursing and maintenance of one or more infants under the age of seven years apart from their parents or having no parents, he must give notice in writing to the local authority within forty-eight hours from the reception of the child. If an infant is already in the care of a person without reward and he undertakes to continue the nursing for reward, such undertaking is a reception of the child.
Source: Wikisource

William Feilden Craies and Thomas Allan Ingram 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica (1911)

Starting from the earlier conception, which limited ill-treatment legally punishable to actual threats or blows, the common law came to recognize criminal liability in cases where persons, bound under duty or contract to supply necessaries to a child, unable by reason of its tender years to provide for itself, wilfully neglected to supply them, and thereby caused the death of the child or injury to its health, although no actual assault had been committed.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature