William Robertson Smith, and Stanley Arthur Cook, and Claude Hermann Walter Johns

Biographical details

William Robertson Smith, and Stanley Arthur Cook, and Claude Hermann Walter Johns 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica (1911)

In fact, as our Lord puts it, the Rabbinical theory seemed to be that the Sabbath was not made for man but man for the Sabbath, the observance of which was so much an end in itself that the rules prescribed for it did not require to be justified by appeal to any larger principle of religion or humanity. The precepts of the law were valuable in the eyes of the Scribes because they were the seal of Jewish particularism, the barrier erected between the world at large and the exclusive community of Yahweh’s grace.
Source: Wikisource

William Robertson Smith, and Stanley Arthur Cook, and Claude Hermann Walter Johns 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica (1911)

To save life was allowed, but only because danger to life “superseded the Sabbath.” In like manner the special ritual at the temple prescribed for the Sabbath by the Pentateuchal law was not regarded as any part of the hallowing of the sacred day; on the contrary, the rule was that, in this regard, “Sabbath was not kept in the sanctuary.” Strictly speaking, therefore, the Sabbath was neither a day of relief to toiling humanity nor a day appointed for public worship; the positive duties of its observance were to wear one’s best clothes, eat, drink and be glad (justified from Isa. lviii. 13) .
Source: Wikisource

William Robertson Smith, and Stanley Arthur Cook, and Claude Hermann Walter Johns 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica (1911)

But, if the week as a religious cycle is older than the idea of the week of creation, we cannot hope to find more than probable evidence of the origin of the Sabbath. Unless the Sabbath was already an institution peculiarly Jewish, it could not have served as a mark of distinction from heathenism.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature