Agnes Muriel Clay

Summary

Agnes Muriel Clay 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica (1911)

But the senate had acquired a far more effective control over the popular vote through the observance of certain unwritten rules regulating the relation between senate and magistrates. It was generally understood that the magistrate should not question the people on any important matter without the senate’s consent, nor refuse to do so at its request; that one magistrate should not employ his veto to quash the act of another except at the senate’s bidding, nor refuse to do so when directed.
Source: Wikisource

Agnes Muriel Clay 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica (1911)

The appointment of senators depended entirely upon the king. They were not appointed for life, but at the pleasure of the king who summoned them. It is possible that a king might change his advisers during his reign, and a new king could certainly abstain from summoning some of those convened by his predecessors. [2] The powers of the senate at this time were very indefinite. Tradition ascribes to it the control of the interregnum and a power of sanctioning acts of state (patrum auctoritas) , to which it is difficult to give any significance for this early period.
Source: Wikisource

Agnes Muriel Clay 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica (1911)

A regular system was soon established by which the censor, who held office every fifth year, placed all the sources of public revenue in the hands of certain individuals or companies, who on payment of a fixed sum into the treasury, or on giving adequate security for such payment, received the right to make what profit they could out of the revenues during the five years that should elapse before the next censorship.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature