Summary

Portrait of Alexander Henry Haliday Alexander Henry Haliday Retrospect of various works published during 1856

It appears that they recognize in general sound principles of scientific nomenclature and chronological precedency, but they have by no means invariably adhered to these in practice. We are not prepared, indeed, to blame them for having retained—whether deliberately or from mere traditional habit—the modern trivial names of many species, to the exclusion of the more ancient, but now unfamiliar ones of the last century
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Alexander Henry Haliday Alexander Henry Haliday Retrospect of various works published during 1856

If for a republication of a standard work of Entomology generally, Kirby and Spence's Introduction is the best value for the lowest price we know ; so are Lacordaire's volumes on the Genera of Coleoptera the cheapest of an original work. Estimated by the labour and materials they must have required, the information condensed in them, and the time and pains which they save the student, were it only as an index to the species, they would be worth their weight in silver at least.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Alexander Henry Haliday Alexander Henry Haliday Retrospect of various works published during 1856

A general collation of the work—so far as it has been carried—with Stephens' Manual of British Beetles—or, indeed, with any other complete list of the indigenous species of this order, which we possess as yet—would lead to a very erroneous estimate of the proportion. We have confined ourselves to the comparison of a single family, one of the most extensive and most thoroughly investigated, and which, of all the great families of the order, has been earliest made the subject of a complete revision, subsequent to the date of Stephens' Manual.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature