Alfred North Whitehead

Alfred North Whitehead

Summary

Portrait of Alfred North Whitehead Alfred North Whitehead 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 17… (1911)

Indeed, it is only by experience that we can know that any definite process of counting will give the true cardinal number of some class of entities. It is perfectly possible to imagine a universe in which any act of counting by a being in it annihilated some members of the class counted during the time and only during the time of its continuance.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Alfred North Whitehead Alfred North Whitehead 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 17… (1911)

It is open to any one to use any word in any sense. But on the assumption that “mathematics” is to denote a science well marked out by its subject matter and its methods from other topics of thought, and that at least it is to include all topics habitually assigned to it, there is now no option but to employ “mathematics” in the general sense [5] of the “science concerned with the logical deduction of consequences from the general premisses of all reasoning.”
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Alfred North Whitehead Alfred North Whitehead 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 17… (1911)

Now a class in respect to its components is many. In what sense then can it be one? This problem of “the one and the many” has been discussed continuously by the philosophers. [8] All the contradictions can be avoided, and yet the use of classes and relations can be preserved as required by mathematics, and indeed by common sense, by a theory which denies to a class—or relation—existence or being in any sense in which the entities composing it—or related by it—exist. Thus, to say that a pen is an entity and the class of pens is an entity is merely a play upon the word “entity”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature