Arkansas Supreme Court; J. Fred Jones; Conley Byrd

Summary

Arkansas Supreme Court; J. Fred Jones; Conley Byrd Schenck v. Knight (1974)

It may be that Donna Marie appears too immature to properly care for her baby, but the record amply illustrates that she has that something which, despite her poverty and immaturity, has pulled together some friends and a capable lawyer to give their time to try to help her get her baby that was silently taken from her by a prestigious agency bespeaking goodness and benevolence.
Source: Wikisource

Arkansas Supreme Court; J. Fred Jones; Conley Byrd Schenck v. Knight (1974)

Perhaps I am too sympathetic toward motherhood, however, as between the mother and one who takes her baby away without her consent and without notice it appears that some law of nature ought to favor the mother and discourage those who unlawfully take a baby whether the latter be a common thief or a prestigious state agency—at least until such time as the mother has had an opportunity to demonstrate her fitness or unfitness.
Source: Wikisource

Arkansas Supreme Court; J. Fred Jones; Conley Byrd Schenck v. Knight (1974)

The court is of the opinion that Donna Marie Schenck would not in any way have objected to adoption proceedings or otherwise attempted to regain custody of her child except for the pressure applied by her mother, Mary Ann Brown. From the testimony and personal observations of Mary Ann Brown, the Court is of the opinion that she manifests substantial instability and is unable to cope with her past and present problems and would be unable to provide proper care for the child.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature