Summary

Portrait of Arthur Eddington Arthur Eddington Space Time and Gravitation: An outline of the general relativity theory… (1920)

In so far as our knowledge of nature is a knowledge of intersections of world-lines, it is absolute knowledge independent of the observer. If we examine the nature of our observations, distinguishing what is actually seen from what is merely inferred, we find that, at least in all exact measurements, our knowledge is primarily built up of intersections of world-lines of two or more entities, that is to say their coincidences.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Arthur Eddington Arthur Eddington Space Time and Gravitation: An outline of the general relativity theory… (1920)

We cannot imagine ourselves exploring the inside of an electron with moving particles, light-waves, or material clocks and measuring-rods; hence, without further definition, any geometry of the interior, or any statement about space and time in the interior, is meaningless. But in common life, and frequently in physics, we are not concerned with this microscopic structure of matter. We need to know, not the actual values of the 's at a point, but their average values through a region, small from the ordinary standpoint but large compared with the molecular structure of matter.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Arthur Eddington Arthur Eddington Space Time and Gravitation: An outline of the general relativity theory… (1920)

It is clear that the law (4) is not the law of gravitation for which we are seeking, because it is much too drastic. If it were a law of nature, then only flat space-time could exist in nature, and there would be no such thing as gravitation. It is not the general condition, but a special case—when all attracting matter is infinitely remote.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature