Summary

Portrait of Arthur Goldberg Arthur Goldberg Silver v. New York Stock Exchange…

Given the principle that exchange self-regulation is to be regarded as justified in response to antitrust charges only to the extent necessary to protect the achievement of the aims of the Securities Exchange Act, it is clear that no justification can be offered for self-regulation conducted without provision for some method of telling a protesting non-member why a rule is being invoked so as to harm him and allowing him to reply in explanation of his position.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Arthur Goldberg Arthur Goldberg Silver v. New York Stock Exchange…

No policy reflected in the Securities Exchange Act is, to begin with, served by denial of notice and an opportunity for hearing. Indeed, the aims of the statutory scheme of self-policing-to protect investors and promote fair dealing-are defeated when an exchange exercises its tremendous economic power without explaining its basis for acting, for the absence of an obligation to give some form of notice and, if timely requested, a hearing creates a great danger of perpetration of injury that will damage public confidence in the exchanges.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Arthur Goldberg Arthur Goldberg Silver v. New York Stock Exchange…

Experience teaches, however, that the affording of procedural safeguards, which by their nature serve to illuminate the underlying facts, in itself often operates to prevent erroneous decisions on the merits from occurring. There is no reason to believe that the experience of the Exchange will be different from that of other institutions, both public and private. The benefits which a guarantee of procedural safeguards brings about are, moreover, of particular importance here.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature