Benjamin Breckinridge Warfield

Summary

Benjamin Breckinridge Warfield On the Revision of the Confession of Faith (1890)

I cannot think it consistent with essential honesty to accept a creed, or to continue to live under a creed which we have accepted, for system of doctrine—the system of doctrine of which we do not believe. For a Church to impose a formula which she does not intend to be taken in its strictest sense and to require to be lived up to, it seems to me, would be dishonest in her, and would be a betrayal of her trust as the pillar and ground of the truth.
Source: Wikisource

Benjamin Breckinridge Warfield On the Revision of the Confession of Faith (1890)

If we have a defensible right to be Presbyterians, we have as just a right to our separate creed as to our separate organization.
And who is to determine for us the minimum of truth which Christian men are bound to confess? Is it so easy a matter to distinguish between such essential doctrines as we dare not mar our witness to, and the unessential ones which we may suppress public confession of for the sake of outward unity of organization? Does not the line of division fluctuate from age to age?
Source: Wikisource

Benjamin Breckinridge Warfield On the Revision of the Confession of Faith (1890)

The Assembly of divines which framed the Confession, may be said, humanly speaking, to have come just at the last moment of time when such an Assembly was possible, when the Church was still under the happy influence of a marvellous revival, when the Word of God was felt as a living, quickening, transforming power, and preached not as a tradition, but as the very power and wisdom of God, by men of ripe scholarship and devoted piety, who have remained our models of earnest preaching and our guides in practical godliness, even unto this day.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature