Summary

Portrait of Benjamin N. Cardozo Benjamin N. Cardozo Daube v. United States — Opinion of the Court

A very different situation is laid before us here. No definitive adjudication in favor of this taxpayer was ever made by the Commissioner or by other competent authority. The transaction never went beyond the stage of intradepartmental conference and parley. The Commissioner had put his hand, it is true, to a schedule of refunds and credits, and had transmitted a check to one of his subordinates to be delivered to the claimant.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Benjamin N. Cardozo Benjamin N. Cardozo Daube v. United States — Opinion of the Court

In anticipation of an assessment, petitioner had filed with the Bureau an agreement and direction that any refund due to him individually for the year 1918 (but without mention of any other year) should be applied as a credit upon the taxes owing from the partnership. When the schedule of refunds and credits came back from the collector, the Commissioner overlooked the order, then on file in his office, for the merger of the two accounts, and dealt with them as separate. He made an additional assessment against the partnership for $53,012.47.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature