Summary

Portrait of Benjamin N. Cardozo Benjamin N. Cardozo McCandless v. Furlaud (296 U.S. 140…

Confusion of thought is inevitable unless the position of the wrongdoers as trustees is steadily kept in mind. What is here is something more than a tort of fraudulent representations to be redressed by the recovery of damages at the suit of the defrauded creditors. What is here is a tort growing out of the fraudulent depletion of the assets by men chargeable as trustees if they have failed to act with honor. There are important differences, moreover, between an overissue of stock, which may leave the assets unimpaired, and a withdrawal of cash, which puts the enterprise in peril.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Benjamin N. Cardozo Benjamin N. Cardozo McCandless v. Furlaud (296 U.S. 140…

It has never been doubted that his right of action for a fraud committed upon the corporation by a third person is no greater than, and no different from, that available to the corporation. It is a novel doctrine that, if individual creditors have at the date of the receivership their own causes of action against third parties for fraud or misrepresentation, upon the appointment of a receiver these causes of action are assigned in law to the receiver.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature