Benjamin Thorpe

Summary

Benjamin Thorpe,  The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle (1861)

“ I regret my inability to supply any information relative to the authors of the poetic effusions in the Saxon Chronicle. Are they by the writers of the prose narrative, or are they only insertions? The latter seems to me the more probable opinion. Of these, the first, not only in the order of time, but in excellence, is the ode on the Battle of Brunnanburh (A.D. 937) ; and a matter it is of regret that the name of its author has irrecoverably perished. Of the other pieces, little can be said in praise; they are rather rhythmical and alliterative prose than poetry ”
Source: Wikisource

Benjamin Thorpe,  The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle (1861)

“ But to produce the Chronicle complete, there was no midway between the plan here adopted, and the less satisfactory one hitherto followed, of taking the most esteemed manuscript for a text, and printing beneath all deviations from it, in the shape of various readings, unpleasant and inconvenient to consult, and, it is believed, by only a few readers, ever consulted; and frequently equalling in mass, and sometimes exceeding, the text itself. ”
Source: Wikisource

Benjamin Thorpe,  The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle (1861)

“ It is deeply to be regretted that an historic monument so important, and of such great interest to all students of our early times, not only in Britain, but throughout all Germanic lands, as the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, should afford us no information with regard to its several writers, [1] or to the mode in which it gradually grew into the form in which we now possess it. Equally devoid are we of all indirect or collateral evidence, tending to cast a glimmering of light on these points. ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature