Summary

Byron White Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v… (1976)

I am not yet prepared to accept the notion that normal rules of law, procedure, and constitutional adjudication suddenly become irrelevant solely because a case touches on the subject of abortion. The majority's finding of fact that women in Missouri will be unable to obtain abortions after the first trimester if the saline method is banned is wholly unjustifiable.
Source: Wikisource

Byron White Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v… (1976)

A father's interest in having a child--perhaps his only child--may be unmatched by any other interest in his life. See Stanley v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 645, 651 (1972) , and cases there cited. It is truly surprising that the majority finds in the United States Constitution, as it must in order to justify the result it reaches, a rule that the State must assign a greater value to a mother's decision to cut off a potential human life by abortion than to a father's decision to let it mature into a live child.
Source: Wikisource

Byron White Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v… (1976)

No person who performs or induces an abortion shall fail to exercise that degree of professional skill, care and diligence to preserve the life and health of the fetus which such person would be required to exercise in order to preserve the life and health of any fetus intended to be born and not aborted. Any physician or person assisting in the abortion who shall fail to take such measures to encourage or to sustain the life of the child, and the death of the child results, shall be deemed guilty of manslaughter....
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature