Summary

Byron White South Carolina v. Gathers — Opinion of the Court

Because the Eighth Amendment itself requires "that the penalty imposed in a capital case be proportional to the harm caused and the defendant's blameworthiness," Enmund v. Florida, 458 U.S. 782, 823, 102 S.Ct. 3368, 3390, 73 L.Ed.2d 1140 (1982) (O'CONNOR, J., dissenting) , I would reject a rigid Eighth Amendment rule which prohibits a sentencing jury from hearing argument or considering evidence concerning the personal characteristics of the victim.
Source: Wikisource

Byron White South Carolina v. Gathers — Opinion of the Court

Booth has not even an arguable basis in the common-law background that led up to the Eighth Amendment, in any longstanding societal tradition, or in any evidence that present society, through its laws or the actions of its juries, has set its face against considering the harm caused by criminal acts in assessing responsibility. The Court's opinion in Booth, like today's opinion, did not even try to assert the contrary. We provide far greater reassurance of the rule of law by eliminating than by retaining such a decision.
Source: Wikisource

Byron White South Carolina v. Gathers — Opinion of the Court

Nothing in the Eighth Amendment precludes a State, if it chooses, from "includ [ing] as a sentencing consideration the particularized harm that an individual's murder causes to the rest of society," id., at 517, 107 S.Ct., at 2540 (WHITE, J., dissenting) . Indeed, precisely because the harm caused to society by a particular victim's death is relevant to society's moral judgment concerning the proper punishment, I would decline to read Booth for the broad proposition that the victim's personal characteristics are irrelevant at the sentencing phase of a capital trial.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature