Summary

David Davis Campbell v. City of Kenosha — Opinion of the Court

Of such importance did the legislature consider the interests of Kenosha in the railroad to Beloit that a commissioner, of the dignity of a city officer, was deemed necessary to look to them. And that the legislature intended to ratify the proceedings of the common council, which resulted in the subscription of stock to the railroad and issue of scrip, is very clear, else why was the commissioner directed to provide for the payment of the scrip as it matured? The words of the law are imperative.
Source: Wikisource

David Davis Campbell v. City of Kenosha — Opinion of the Court

The Supreme Court of the State, in the interpretation of the foregoing provision of the constitution, [2] has declared that the legislature could not confer on a municipal corporation unlimited power to levy taxes and raise money, beyond what was proper for purely municipal purposes; and as this was attempted to be done in section eight of the amended charter of the city of Kenosha, that the taxes levied under it, to aid the Kenosha and Beloit Railroad, were unauthorized, and the city authorities could be restrained from collecting them at the instance of a party interested.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature