Summary

David Irving v Penguin Books and Deborah Lipstadt… (2000)

THE CLAIM THAT IRVING ASSOCIATES WITH RIGHT WING EXTREMISTS
Introductory
10.1 It is common knowledge that there exist within this country, as well as in Europe, the United States and elsewhere, a variety of right-wing groups and organisations. Of course some stand further to the right in the political spectrum than others. The groups themselves differ in their structure: some are formally constituted and readily identifiable; others are loose-knit and hard to pin down.
Source: Wikisource

David Irving v Penguin Books and Deborah Lipstadt… (2000)

Althans was accepted by Irving to be an extremist, although that had not been apparent when they first met. Irving regretted his acqaintance with him. As to Philip, Irving agreed that he is a friend and a revisionist. His position in relation to Zundel was similar: he agreed that he is a revisionist holding right-wing political views but considers him to be a respectable man who is “free of any conviction”.
Source: Wikisource

David Irving v Penguin Books and Deborah Lipstadt… (2000)

Others are less extreme: they may themselves be non-violent and oppose the stirring up of violence by rabble-rousing public speeches and demonstrations. The political objectives of some of these individuals may be limited to the adoption of right-wing policies on such issues as immigration, housing and social policy within the framework of existing democratic structures.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature