David Walker

Summary

David Walker,  Hawkins v. Filkins (1866)

“ But that a convention, called by the people of a state, to remodel their constitution so as to make it conform to the constitution of the United States, would intentionally, in a spirit of wantonness and cruelty unprecedented, with one sweep of the pen throw into chaos and confusion, all of the action of the state government for years—a government too which perhaps many of them had contributed to make, whose laws they had helped to execute, and for whose defence their arm or voice, had, at one time or other, been raised, we cannot believe. ”
Source: Wikisource

David Walker,  Hawkins v. Filkins (1866)

“ The late war with the United States, then, being a civil war, all of the rights of the citizens within the territory where it existed, may well be claimed. But the fact that it is a civil war does not, necessarily, give to the victors all of the rights of conquest as between foreign nations. In a domestic war between different portions of the same government, so far as regards the suppression of armed resistance, it may be complete, but the rules of conquest over foreign territory do not apply to their full extent; no government can, properly speaking, conquer its own territory. ”
Source: Wikisource

David Walker,  Hawkins v. Filkins (1866)

“ The idea of either conquest or coercion, is not to be tolerated from any thing in the history or structure of our government, unless it be that coercion which is necessary to suppress insurrection and rebellion. The public mind has been for a time unsettled upon this question, and, even at this time, it would seem that there exists, in some minds, an impression that, by the exercise of military force, the whole civil governments of the states have been overturned by revolution; in consequence of which, new powers have sprung into existence. ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature