Summary

Portrait of Denny Chin Denny Chin 20th Century Fox Film Corp. v. Cablevision Systems Corp…

Cablevision does not contest that the streaming of recorded programming in response to a customer’s request is a performance. It again suggests, however, that it is passive in this process—that it is the customer, not Cablevision, that is “doing” the performing. I reject this suggestion, for the same reasons that I reject the argument that the customer is “doing” the copying involved in the RS-DVR. Cablevision actively participates in the playback process. The customer’s use of the remote control to select a recorded program for viewing does not, in itself, result in playback.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Denny Chin Denny Chin 20th Century Fox Film Corp. v. Cablevision Systems Corp…

Under the plain language of this clause, a transmission “to the public” is a public performance, even if members of the public receive the transmission at separate places at different times. Such is the case here. Cablevision would transmit the same program to members of the public, who may receive the performance at different times, depending on whether they view the program in real time or at a later time as an RS-DVR playback.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Denny Chin Denny Chin 20th Century Fox Film Corp. v. Cablevision Systems Corp…

Plaintiffs’ motions are granted and defendants’ motion is denied, for I conclude that Cablevision, and not just its customers, would be engaging in unauthorized reproductions and transmissions of plaintiffs’ copyrighted programs under the RS-DVR. Indeed, the RS-DVR is not a stand-alone machine that sits on top of a television.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature