Summary

Earl W. Stevick,  Adapting and Writing Language Lessons… (1971)

“ A nineteenth-century German, Gabelentz, observed that for elementary instruction the best language teacher is a ;talkative person with a limited range of ideas;. (in Jespersen 1904, p. 74) If a student meets too many words and too many new grammar structures too soon, he is overwhelmed. Yet students are motivated best by genuine use of the new language, and genuine use, by definition, can place no restrictions on vocabulary or on grammar. Gabelentz handled this dilemma by the way he chose teachers. How can this formula be applied to the developent of textbooks and other teaching materials? ”
Source: Wikisource

Earl W. Stevick,  Adapting and Writing Language Lessons… (1971)

“ One advantage in texts taken from such sources is that students know that they are working with something which was intended as communication among speakers of the language, and which therefore carries an unquestionable authenticity. Another advantage is that these sources can be used even by a teacher whose personal command of the target language is limited. Such teachers are less common in the seldom-taught languages, where most teaching is done by native speakers. ”
Source: Wikisource

Earl W. Stevick,  Adapting and Writing Language Lessons… (1971)

“ The most dramatic is to allow the class to suggest a topic at the beginning of the same hour in which the text is to be used. The instructor is asked to speak on this topic, completely impromptu, for about 30 seconds. He is told that someone will signal him at the end of that time. He then begins to speak. There may be a fair number of hesitations and false starts, but most people seem to be able to do it. He then goes on and tells the story two or three more times, working out a stable form of it and at the same time giving the students genuine practice in oral comprehension. ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature