Summary

Portrait of Earl Warren Earl Warren Commissioner of Internal Revenue v…

Given the Commissioner's longstanding and judicially approved interpretation, the knowledge of that interpretation by Congress, and the fact that Congress has chosen to deal specially by tax-free allowances with the financial problems peculiar to military life, we must agree with the Commissioner that the military taxpayer is not 'away from home' when he is at his permanent duty station whether or not it is feasible or even permissible for his family to reside with him there.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Earl Warren Earl Warren Commissioner of Internal Revenue v…

It is contended that respondent's situation at Iwakuni was directly analogous to that of a naval officer on a ship at sea for an extended period of time. The Commissioner justifies the discrepant treatment by arguing that a naval officer should be treated like the engineer of a train, a bus driver, or an airplane pilot for purposes of the travel-expense deduction; the principal place of business of such taxpayers is their home terminal and they are allowed the deduction when away from that terminal on business trips.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Earl Warren Earl Warren Commissioner of Internal Revenue v…

The system is designed to provide complete and direct relief from such problems as opposed to the incomplete and indirect relief which an income tax deduction affords to a civilian business traveler. [21] If the system of allowances is in fact inadequate, or if there are inconsistencies in the Commissioner's application of the travel-expense provision to military personnel, [22] it is the province of Congress and the Commissioner, not the courts, to make the appropriate adjustments.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature