Ed. C. Ross

Summary

Ed. C. Ross The Whitman Controversy (1885)

The fact that so many witnesses, giving details of events that have transpired forty years ago, tell them in different language, or with immaterial variation as to main facts, does not impeach these witnesses. It only proves that each has told the story in his own language, and that there has been no collusion between them as to the story they should tell. While I have never doubted Daniel Webster's patriotism, or his wisdom, a quotation from a speech made by him in the Senate three years after Dr. Whitman's visit, proves that he had not yet monopolized all of the latter commodity.
Source: Wikisource

Ed. C. Ross The Whitman Controversy (1885)

Whitman wore buckskin or broadcloth. Daniel Webster would not guage the value of a man's opinion by the cut of his coat or by the material that entered into the make-up of his trowsers; while Dr. Whitman was a man whose presence would command respect in any place, from the wickiup to the White House.
The journey of Dr. Whitman, made in the winter of 1842-3, from his station in Walla Walla valley to the states, was one of the most perilous, daring and remarkable feats ever accomplished by any traveler.
Source: Wikisource

Ed. C. Ross The Whitman Controversy (1885)

Victor tells us that Catholic priests do not meddle with politics. Soon, instead of a settlement of American citizens, we would have had a settlement of British subjects occupying the ground that would have been abandoned by Dr. Whitman. Every impulse of this truly patriotic American must have revolted at the thought. Well was it, then, for American interests that he held his ground.
Mrs. Victor denies that Dr. Whitman could have believed that he might reach Washington before the boundary negotiations should be completed, yet he did so, and had some three years to spare.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature