Summary

Edward Douglass White Caldwell v. Parker — Opinion of the Court

These arguments, while differing in forms of expression, rest upon the broad assumption that Congress in re-enacting the Articles of War in 1916 (Comp. St. § 2308a) , by an exercise of constitutional authority, vested in the military courts during a state of war exclusive jurisdiction to try and punish persons in the military service for offenses committed by them which were violative of the law of the several states.
Source: Wikisource

Edward Douglass White Caldwell v. Parker — Opinion of the Court

But the contention relied upon is directly based upon the words, 'except in time of war,' as qualifying the duty of the military officers to respond to the demand by state authority for the surrender of military offenders against the state criminal laws, imposed by article 74, and the grant in article 92, expressed in the form of a negative pregnant, of authority to courts-martial to try capital crimes when committed by an officer or soldier within the geographical limits of the United States and the District Columbia in time of war.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature