Summary

Portrait of Harold Hitz Burton Harold Hitz Burton,  Williams v. United States (327 U.S. 711…

“ It has not even been suggested that a conflicting state definition could give a narrower scope to the offense than that given to it by Congress. We believe that, similarly, a conflicting state definition does not enlarge the scope of the offense defined by Congress. The Assimilative Crimes Act has a natural place to fill through its supplementation of the Federal Criminal Code, without giving it the added effect of modifying or repealing existing provisions of the Federal Code. ”
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Harold Hitz Burton Harold Hitz Burton,  Williams v. United States (327 U.S. 711…

“ It is not disputed that this Indian reservation is 'reserved or acquired for the use of the United States, and under the exclusive or concurrent jurisdiction thereof,' [2] or that it is 'Indian country' within the meaning of Rev.Stat. § 2145. [3] This means that many sections of the Federal Criminal Code apply to the reservation, including not only the Assimilative Crimes Act, but also those making penal the offenses of rape, [4] assault with intent to commit rape, [5] having carnal knowledge of a girl, [6] adultery [7] and fornication. ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature