Summary

Edward Douglass White United States v. Ferger — Opinion of the Court

That bills of lading for the movement of interstate commerce are instrumentalities of that commerce which Congress under its power to regulate commerce has the authority to deal with and provide for is too clear for anything but statement, as manifested not only by that which is concluded by prior decisions, but also by the exertion of the power by Congress.
Source: Wikisource

Edward Douglass White United States v. Ferger — Opinion of the Court

That, as instrumentalities of interstate commerce, bills of lading are the efficient means of credit resorted to for the purpose of securing and fructifying the flow of a vast volume of interstate commerce upon which the commercial intercourse of the country, both domestic and foreign, largely depends, is a matter of common knowledge as to the course of business of which we may take judicial notice.
Source: Wikisource

Edward Douglass White United States v. Ferger — Opinion of the Court

The demurrer was sustained and all the counts in the indictment were dismissed (256 Fed. 388) . The court said: 'It was agreed in the argument and assumed in the briefs of counsel that the so-called bills of lading were fictitious, in that there was no actual consignor or consignee and that they did not relate to any shipment or attempted shipment of corn whatsoever.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature