Summary

Portrait of Emma Orczy Emma Orczy "The Hocussing of Cigarette" (1904)

Keeson go to the stables that night? Did she go?" I asked.
"Cockram swears she did."
"She swears she didn't. If she did why should she have asked for her son? Surely she did not wish to incriminate her son in order to save herself?"
"No," he replied; "women don't save themselves usually at the expense of their children, and women don't usually 'hocus' a horse. It is not a female crime at all—is it?"
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Emma Orczy Emma Orczy "The Hocussing of Cigarette" (1904)

Keeson who had trained Cigarette for the Earl of Okehampton, and who, of course, had charge of her during her apprenticeship, before she was destined to win a fortune for her owner, her trainer, and those favoured few who had got wind of her capabilities. For Cigarette was to be kept a dark horse—not an easy matter in these days, when the neighbourhood of every racecourse abounds with rascals who eke out a precarious livelihood by various methods, more or less shady, of which the gleaning of early information is perhaps the least disreputable.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Emma Orczy Emma Orczy "The Hocussing of Cigarette" (1904)

Think, think! A woman does not incriminate her child to save herself; but she might do it to save someone else—someone who was dearer to her than that child."
"Nonsense!" I protested.
"Nonsense, is it?" he replied. "You have only to think of the characters of the chief personages who figured in the drama—of the trainer Keeson, with his hasty temper and his inordinate family pride. Was it likely when the half-ruined Earl of Okehampton talked of mésalliance, and forbade the marriage of his daughter with his trainer's son that the latter would not resent that insult with terrible bitterness?
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature