Summary

Portrait of Felix Frankfurter Felix Frankfurter Ford Motor Company v. United States Commercial Investment Trust Corporation…

Yet the Government seeks a change in the express terms of the decree which would perpetuate that inequality. The Government has not sustained the burden of showing good cause why a court of equity should grant relief from an undertaking well understood and carefully formulated. If the Government seeks to outlaw possible arrangements by Ford with a finance corporation, it must establish its case in court against Ford as against General Motors and not draw on a consent which by its very terms is not available.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Felix Frankfurter Felix Frankfurter Ford Motor Company v. United States Commercial Investment Trust Corporation…

As a mere matter of interpreting language, the Government hardly challenges the fitness of the terms 'persuasion,' 'exposition' or 'argument,' which the jury was charged were open to General Motors, to cover acts such as arranging for the presence of agents of both Ford and CIT with a view to putting the claims of CIT to a dealer or recommending, endorsing, and advertising CIT to a dealer.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Felix Frankfurter Felix Frankfurter Ford Motor Company v. United States Commercial Investment Trust Corporation…

It is not unreasonable for the General Motors Company to have contracts with its dealers for a year or to have a cancellation clause in them. They have a perfect right to have a finance company and to recommend its use. They have a perfect right to cancel a contract from their dealer as long as they are not performing any unreasonable act.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature