Summary

Portrait of Felix Frankfurter Felix Frankfurter Granville-Smith v. Granville-Smith…

The clear impact of the legislation, even if we disregard the candid explanations of local political, commercial and legal sources [23] and the rapid drop in divorces following the initial decision of unconstitutionality, is to provide a convenient forum for prosperous persons with substantial connections to the mainland, who desire to sever their marital ties while vacationing. The Commissioner in the case at bar did not even ask petitioner where she lived in the Virgin Islands.
The Legislative Assembly is much less liberal toward would-be voters. [24] One-year domicile is required.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Felix Frankfurter Felix Frankfurter Granville-Smith v. Granville-Smith…

It is hardly reasonable to believe that Congress was less concerned with the scope of divorce jurisdiction in the 'unincorporated' possession of the Virgin Islands, so temptingly near the mainland, and that it intended to give them unrestricted freedom in this sensitive field of legislation. The Virgin Islands divorce law, with the exception of substantive grounds drawn from Danish law, copied that of Alaska.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Felix Frankfurter Felix Frankfurter Granville-Smith v. Granville-Smith…

By virtue of the 1936 Organic Act, the Legislative Assembly passed the 1944 divorce law making six weeks' 'residence' by an 'inhabitant' sufficient for divorce jurisdiction. [10] In 1952, the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit construed 'inhabitant' and 'residence' to imply 'domiciliary' and 'domicile.' Burch v. Burch, 195 F.2d 799. The legislature thereupon provided that six weeks' 'physical presence' was adequate as a basis for divorce.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature