Summary

Portrait of Felix Frankfurter Felix Frankfurter Shelton v. Tucker, 364 U.S. 479 …

Granted that a given teacher's membership in the First Street Congregation is, standing alone, of little relevance to what may rightly be expected of a teacher, is that membership equally irrelevant when it is discovered that the teacher is in fact a member of the First Street Congregation and the Second Street Congregation and the Third Street Congregation and the 4-H Club and the 3-H Club and half a dozen other groups?
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Felix Frankfurter Felix Frankfurter Shelton v. Tucker, 364 U.S. 479 …

A teacher's answers to the questions which Arkansas asks, moreover, may serve the purpose of making known to school authorities persons who come into contact with the teacher in all of the phases of his activity in the community, and who can be questioned, if need be, concerning the teacher's conduct in matters which this Court can certainly not now say are lacking in any pertinence to professional fitness.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Felix Frankfurter Felix Frankfurter Shelton v. Tucker, 364 U.S. 479 …

It is because that very freedom, [p496] in its most creative reaches, is dependent in no small part upon the careful and discriminating selection of teachers. This process of selection is an intricate affair, a matter of fine judgment, and if it is to be informed, it must be based upon a comprehensive range of information. I am unable to say, on the face of this statute, that Arkansas could not reasonably find that the information which the statute requires—and which may not be otherwise acquired than by asking the question which it asks—is germane to that selection.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature