Geoffrey Chaucer,
Chaucer's Works (ed. Skeat) Vol…
(1900)
“ But Tyrwhitt well remarks, in a note to l. 12074 (i. e. C. 140) :—'In the Discourse, &c., I forgot to mention the Roman de la Rose as one of the sources of this tale; though, upon examination, I find that our author has drawn more from thence, than from either Gower or Livy.' It is absurd to argue, as in Bell's Chaucer, that our poet must necessarily have known Livy 'in the original,' and then to draw the conclusion that we must look to Livy only as the true source of the Tale. For it is perfectly obvious that Tyrwhitt is right as regards the Roman de la Rose ”
