Summary

Portrait of Geoffrey Chaucer Geoffrey Chaucer The Canterbury Tales — Introduction (1900)

All who have been accustomed to former (complete) editions have necessarily imbibed hundreds of false impressions, and have necessarily accepted numberless theories as to the scansion of lines which they will, in course of due time, be prepared to abandon. In the course of my work, it has been made clear to me that Chaucer's text has been manipulated and sophisticated, frequently in most cunning and plausible ways, to a far greater extent than I could have believed to be possible.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Geoffrey Chaucer Geoffrey Chaucer The Canterbury Tales — Introduction (1900)

I have paid especial attention to the suffixes required by Middle-English grammar, to the scansion, and to the pronunciation; and I suppose that this is the first complete edition in which the spelling has been tested by phonetic considerations. With a view to making the spelling a little clearer and more consistent, I have ventured to adopt certain methods which I here explain.
In certain words of variable spelling in E., such as whan or whanne, than or thanne, I have adopted that form which the scansion requires; but the MS. is usually right.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Geoffrey Chaucer Geoffrey Chaucer The Canterbury Tales — Introduction (1900)

MS. Hl. contains the best copy of the Tale of Gamelyn, for which see p. 645; this Tale is not found in MSS. of the A-type. Moreover, Group G here precedes Group C and a large part of Group B, whereas in the Ellesmere MS. it follows them. In the Monk's Tale, the lines numbered B 3565-3652 (containing the Tales called the 'modern instances') immediately follow B 3564 (as in this edition) , whereas in the Ellesmere MS. these lines come at the end of the Tale. The 'various readings' of this MS. are often peculiar, and it is difficult to appraise them.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature