Summary

Portrait of George Bentham George Bentham Natural History Review: a quarterly journal of biological science (1861)

Believing, however, as I do, that there exist in nature a certain number of groups of individuals, the limits to whose powers of variation are, under present circumstances, fixed and permanent, I have been in the habit of practically defining the species as the whole of the individual plants which resemble each other sufficiently to make us conclude that they are all, or may have been all, descended from a common parent. Their variations would be such only as we observe among individuals, which we know or believe to have had such a common descent.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of George Bentham George Bentham Natural History Review: a quarterly journal of biological science (1861)

But in nature there are no two individuals exactly alike in every respect. In all collections of individuals, even when the immediate offspring of one parent, peculiarities will be found common to some, and not to all. The species or collection of individuals thus defined, becomes, therefore, as arbitrary as the genus or collection of species, and reduces the rules of classification in the one case, as in the other, to little more than rules of convenience.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of George Bentham George Bentham Natural History Review: a quarterly journal of biological science (1861)

In the first place, it is a very common practice, in thus testing by cultivation the permanency of character in a plant, to remove it bodily to a garden, and there to propagate it by suckers, cuttings, or other modes of division—an experiment which may, indeed, show the immediate effects of soil, climate, or other extraneous influences on the individual—but, as a test of value between species and variety, it can be of no avail. It is the very method adopted by gardeners for perpetuating individual variations.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature