George Howard Earle, Jr.

George Howard Earle, Jr.

Summary

Portrait of George Howard Earle, Jr. George Howard Earle, Jr. The Constitutionality of the Act (1920)

Think of a civil polity which in the interest of one set of persons should undertake to regulate the prices of goods in the country's markets—whenever intemperate overtrading has been followed by a commercial crisis, or an abundant crop, and a small foreign demand has lowered the price of wheat or cotton! If we are to enter upon that path, it is well to know whither it leads. One such step in Socialism leads to another, and the outcome is the subversion of existing society.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of George Howard Earle, Jr. George Howard Earle, Jr. The Constitutionality of the Act (1920)

As the Supreme Court has so often insisted that, no matter how covered, it will seek out and be guided by realities, and that it is a primary duty to safeguard our present system of Republican Government and freedom as against despotism, Communism and all other systems, it seems only necessary to refer again to the decisions already cited to show that, if the Act is to be wrongly interpreted, it must be unconstitutional as establishing the very spirit and principle of Communism in substituting Governmental price fixing for the liberty-preserving method of freedom and competition.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of George Howard Earle, Jr. George Howard Earle, Jr. The Constitutionality of the Act (1920)

Life, liberty, property, and the equal protection of the law, grouped together in the Constitution, are so related that the deprivation of any one of these separate and independent rights may lessen or extinguish the value of the other three. In so far as a man is deprived of the right to labor, his liberty is restricted, his capacity to earn wages and acquire property is lessened, and he is denied the protection which the law affords those who are permitted to work.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature