Summary

Portrait of George Shiras, Jr. George Shiras, Jr. Hegler v. Faulkner (153 U.S. 109…

Conclusiveness is a characteristic of the judgment of every tribunal acting judicially, while acting within the sphere of its jurisdiction, where no appellate tribunal is created. But such conclusiveness is restricted to those questions which are directly submitted for decision. In the case in hand, doubtless the identity of the half-breed George Washington, and his right to receive the land in question as his share of the lands appropriated by the treaty, were finally found.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of George Shiras, Jr. George Shiras, Jr. Hegler v. Faulkner (153 U.S. 109…

It is, indeed, true that the president speaks and acts through the heads of the several departments in relation to subjects that pertain to their respective duties, and that the allotment of these lands by the Indian department must be considered as made by the president in pursuance of the terms of the act of congress and of the treaty. And it may be admitted that the decision of the special Indian agent, in identifying the Indian half-breeds entitled to participate, and in allotting the portion of each, would, in the absence of fraud, be conclusive.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature