Summary

George Sutherland Springer v. Government of the Philippine Islands ex rel…

Property must not be taken without compensation, but with the help of a phrase (the police power) , some property may be taken or destroyed for public use without paying for it, if you do not take too much. When we come to the fundamental distinctions it is still more obvious that they must be received with a certain latitude or our government could not go on.
Source: Wikisource

George Sutherland Springer v. Government of the Philippine Islands ex rel…

The existence in the various Constitutions of occasional provisions expressly giving to one of the departments powers which by their nature otherwise would fall within the general scope of the authority of another department emphasizes, rather than casts doubt upon, the generally inviolate character of this basic rule.
Legislative power, as distinguished from executive power, is the authority to make laws, but not to enforce them or appoint the agents charged with the duty of such enforcement. The latter are executive functions.
Source: Wikisource

George Sutherland Springer v. Government of the Philippine Islands ex rel…

There is nothing in the Organic Act, or in the nature of the legislative power conferred by it, to suggest that the Legislature in acting in respect of the proprietary rights of the government may disregard the limitation that it must exercise legislative and not executive functions. It must deal with the property of the government by making rules, and not by executing them. The appointment of managers (in this instance corporate directors) of property or a business, is essentially an executive act which the Legislature is without capacity to perform directly or through any of its members.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature