Summary

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone Morton Salt Company v. G. S. Suppiger Company…

Where the patent is used as a means of restraining competition with the patentee's sale of an unpatented product, the successful prosecution of an infringement suit even against one who is not a competitor in such sale is a powerful aid to the maintenance of the attempted monopoly of the unpatented article, and is thus a contributing factor in thwarting the public policy underlying the grant of the patent.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone Morton Salt Company v. G. S. Suppiger Company…

It thus appears that respondent is making use of its patent monopoly to restrain competition in the marketing of unpatented articles, salt tablets, for use with the patented machines, and is aiding in the creation of a limited monopoly in the tablets not within that granted by the patent. A patent operates to create and grant to the patentee an exclusive right to make, use and vend the particular device described and claimed in the patent. But a patent affords no immunity for a monopoly not within the grant.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature