Summary

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone National Labor Relations Board v…

There are not a few industries in the United States which, though conducted by relatively small units, contribute in the aggregate a vast volume of interstate commerce. [2] Some, like the clothing industry, are extensively unionized and have had a long and tragic history of industrial strife. It is not to be supposed that Congress, in its attempted nationwide regulation of interstate commerce through the removal of the causes of industrial strife affecting it, intended to exclude such industries from the sweep of the Act.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone National Labor Relations Board v…

Commerce with foreign countries, and among the states, strictly considered, consists in intercourse and traffic, including in these terms navigation and the transportation and transit of persons and property, as well as the purchase, sale, and exchange of commodities.' If it be held that the term includes the regulation of all such manufactures as are intended to be the subject of commercial transactions in the future, it is impossible to deny that it would also include all productive industries that contemplate the same thing.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone National Labor Relations Board v…

Manifestly if such attenuated reasoning-possibility massed upon possibility-suffices, Congress may regulate wages, hours, out-put, prices, etc., whenever any product of employed labor is intended to pass beyond state lines-possibly if consumed next door. Producers of potatoes in Maine, peanuts in Virginia, cotton in Georgia, minerals in Colorado, wheat in Dakota, oranges in California, and thousands of small local enterprises become subject to national direction through a Board.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature