Summary

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone Alabama State Federation Of Labor Local Union N103 United Brotherhood Of Carpenters And Joiners Of America v…

Petitioners do not deny the authority of the state to regulate labor unions. They do not contend that all their practices shown by the record or all their activities required to be reported by § 7 are within the protection of the constitutional provisions preserving the right to free speech or assembly, or that the requirement of § 7 that petitioners file reports, of itself, infringes their right of free speech.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone Alabama State Federation Of Labor Local Union N103 United Brotherhood Of Carpenters And Joiners Of America v…

Petitioners say that any labor organization which has failed to file the report as required by § 7, or which admits to its union a supervisory employee contrary to § 16, will be precluded from acting as a bargaining agent under the National Labor Relations Act.
Assuming as we do for present purposes that these contentions are sound, it does not follow that there is no constitutional scope for application of §§ 7 and 16. The National Labor Relations Act does not extend to all industries and all employees.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone Alabama State Federation Of Labor Local Union N103 United Brotherhood Of Carpenters And Joiners Of America v…

Although it appears that the constitutions of petitioners, or some of them, contain a provision permitting them to charge a fee to union members working in a union 'jurisdiction' outside that in which they live, it nowhere appears that such fees or any of the others specified by petitioners are being or will be charged, or that respondents or the courts have determined that they are unlawful as not being initiation fees or dues, or that any form of legal proceeding based on such a contention is contemplated.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature