Summary

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone United States v. Butler (297 U.S. 1…

A tortured construction of the Constitution is not to be justified by recourse to extreme examples of reckless congressional spending which might occur if courts could not prevent-expenditures which, even if they could be thought to effect any national purpose, would be possible only by action of a legislature lost to all sense of public responsibility.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Harlan F. Stone Harlan F. Stone United States v. Butler (297 U.S. 1…

If the expenditure is for a national public purpose, that purpose will not be thwarted because payment is on condition which will advance that purpose. The action which Congress induces by payments of money to promote the general welfare, but which it does not command or coerce, is but an incident to a specifically granted power, but a permissible means to a legitimate end. If appropriation in aid of a program of curtailment of agricultural production is constitutional, and it is not denied that it is, payment to farmers on condition that they reduce their crop acreage is constitutional.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature