Summary

Portrait of Harry Blackmun Harry Blackmun,  Guidry v. Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund…

“ We do not believe that congressional intent would be effectuated by reading the LMRDA's general reference to "other appropriate relief" as overriding an express, specific congressional directive that pension benefits not be subject to assignment or alienation. In our view, the two statutes are more persuasively reconciled by holding that the LMRDA determines what sort of judgment the aggrieved party may obtain, while ERISA governs the narrow question whether that judgment may be collected through a particular means-a constructive trust placed on the pension. ”
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Harry Blackmun Harry Blackmun,  Guidry v. Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund…

“ Viewing these statutes together with ERISA, the District Court concluded: "In circumstances where the viability of a union and the members' pension plans was damaged by the knavery of a union official, a narrow exception to ERISA's anti-alienation provision is appropriate." 641 F.Supp., at 363. The court therefore ordered that benefits payable to petitioner from all three funds should be held in constructive trust until the Union's judgment and interest thereon were satisfied. ”
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Harry Blackmun Harry Blackmun,  Guidry v. Sheet Metal Workers National Pension Fund…

“ Petitioner Curtis Guidry pleaded guilty to embezzling funds from his union. The union obtained a judgment against him for $275,000. The District Court imposed a constructive trust on Guidry's pension benefits, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirmed that judgment. Petitioner contends that the constructive trust violates the statutory prohibition on assignment or alienation of pension benefits imposed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) , 88 Stat. ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature